【2026】英検®準1級ライティング対策予想問題20選(模範解答付き)

I disagree that traditional lectures should be completely replaced by online learning platforms in universities.
First, online learning limits opportunities for social interaction. In traditional classrooms, students can naturally communicate with classmates and professors, which helps them develop teamwork skills and build valuable academic networks. Such relationships are difficult to create through a screen.
Second, the overall quality of education may decline if everything becomes online. Some subjects require hands-on practice or immediate feedback, which online platforms cannot fully provide. For example, laboratory experiments are essential for understanding complex concepts and applying them in real situations.
For these reasons, traditional lectures should not be completely replaced by online learning platforms, even though digital tools can play a helpful supplementary role. (120語)

I agree that schools should integrate advanced artificial intelligence (AI) tools into daily teaching methods.
First, AI can provide personalized teaching for each student. Since students have different strengths and weaknesses, AI can analyze their learning patterns and offer materials that suit their individual needs. This helps students study more efficiently and stay motivated, which is often difficult in traditional one-size-fits-all classrooms.
Second, using AI tools will prepare students for the future. As AI continues to influence many industries, students who learn how to use these tools from an early stage will have a clear advantage when they enter the workforce. They will develop essential digital literacy skills and adapt more easily to technological changes.
For these reasons, schools should integrate advanced AI tools into daily teaching methods to enhance students’ learning experiences and future opportunities.

I disagree that university students should prioritize their job hunting.
First, focusing too much on job opportunities may cause students to rush into careers that do not truly match their interests or strengths. When students spend excessive time searching for jobs, they might choose positions simply because they seem convenient, rather than considering long-term goals. This can lead to dissatisfaction and frequent job changes later on.
Second, prioritizing job hunting can negatively affect academic performance. University is an important period for gaining specialized knowledge and developing critical thinking skills. If students devote most of their energy to job applications and interviews, they may not fully benefit from their academic programs, which could hurt their future career growth.
For these reasons, university students should not prioritize their job hunting, but instead focus on their studies and explore their goals carefully. (139語)

I agree that all students should participate in a volunteer activity.
First, volunteering helps students develop a strong sense of responsibility. By contributing to their communities, students learn the importance of taking action and supporting others. These experiences encourage them to think beyond their personal concerns and understand their role in society, which is difficult to learn only through classroom lessons.
Second, volunteer work improves students’ communication skills. When working with people of different ages and backgrounds, students must express their ideas clearly and cooperate effectively. Such real-life interactions provide valuable opportunities to practice communication, which will benefit them in future academic and professional situations.
For these reasons, all students should participate in a volunteer activity to grow as responsible individuals and develop essential interpersonal skills. (129語)

I agree that public surveillance cameras should be increased in urban areas.
First, more cameras can significantly reduce crime. They allow police to collect clear evidence and identify criminals more easily. In addition, the presence of cameras works as a strong deterrent, since many offenders avoid committing crimes when they know their actions will be recorded. This contributes directly to lowering crime rates.
Second, surveillance cameras help improve overall safety by supporting quicker responses to emergencies. For instance, when accidents, fires, or medical issues occur, authorities can detect them immediately through camera systems and send help without delay. This function plays an essential role in protecting citizens’ daily lives.
For these reasons, public surveillance cameras should be increased in urban areas to reduce crime and ensure a safer environment for everyone. (131語)

I agree that e-books are better than paper books.
First, e-books offer much greater convenience. Readers can store hundreds of books on a single device and access them anytime without carrying heavy materials. In addition, they can quickly search for information, adjust the font size, or highlight important points, which makes learning and reading more efficient than with traditional paper books.
Second, e-books are better for the environment. Producing paper books requires large amounts of paper, ink, and transportation, all of which contribute to deforestation and carbon emissions. By choosing e-books, we can significantly reduce the use of natural resources and minimize waste. This makes e-books a more sustainable option for future generations.
For these reasons, e-books are better than paper books, offering both practical convenience and environmental benefits. (129語)

I agree that parents should not allow their children to use social media freely.
First, excessive use of social media can harm children’s health. Spending long hours on screens may cause eye strain, sleep problems, and reduced physical activity. In addition, exposure to online content can negatively affect mental health, leading to anxiety or stress in some children.
Second, social media can interfere with study time. Children may spend hours scrolling through feeds or chatting online instead of focusing on homework or learning new skills. This can reduce academic performance and make it difficult for them to develop good study habits.
For these reasons, parents should not allow their children to use social media freely, as doing so can protect both their health and their educational development. (127語)

I agree that all companies should set a limit on working hours.
First, limiting working hours protects employees’ health. Long working hours can lead to stress, fatigue, and serious health problems such as heart disease or mental burnout. By enforcing reasonable limits, companies can ensure that employees maintain a healthier work-life balance, which benefits both their personal well-being and overall job satisfaction.
Second, restricting hours can improve productivity. Overworked employees often become less efficient and make more mistakes. When employees have sufficient rest and time to recharge, they can concentrate better, work more effectively, and produce higher-quality results in the time they spend at work.
For these reasons, all companies should set a limit on working hours, as doing so supports both employees’ health and their productivity. (127語)

I agree that companies should use a performance-based salary system rather than a seniority-based one.
First, a performance-based system is fairer. Employees are rewarded according to their actual contributions rather than simply their years of service. This ensures that hard-working and talented individuals are recognized, which can prevent frustration among staff who feel their efforts are not appreciated under a seniority-based system.
Second, performance-based salaries increase motivation. When employees know that their work directly affects their pay, they are more likely to set goals, improve their skills, and maintain high levels of productivity. This creates a more dynamic and competitive work environment, benefiting both the individual and the company.
For these reasons, companies should adopt a performance-based salary system, as it promotes fairness and encourages employees to work harder. (129語)

I agree that companies should play a bigger role in protecting the environment.
First, taking action on environmental issues improves a company’s reputation. Consumers are increasingly aware of sustainability and prefer businesses that demonstrate responsibility. Companies that actively reduce pollution or use eco-friendly practices can gain public trust and loyalty, which benefits their long-term success.
Second, companies have significant resources that can make a real impact. Large corporations possess financial, technological, and human resources that individuals or small organizations cannot easily match. By investing in renewable energy, waste reduction, or sustainable production methods, companies can contribute substantially to environmental protection.
For these reasons, companies should play a bigger role in protecting the environment, as doing so enhances their reputation and utilizes their resources effectively to benefit society.

I agree that companies should hire more people from foreign countries for the following two reasons.
First, hiring international employees strengthens a company’s human resources. Foreign workers often bring unique skills, perspectives, and experiences that domestic staff may not have. This diversity can enhance creativity, problem-solving, and innovation within the organization, which leads to a successful business.
Second, employing people from abroad supports globalization. Companies with international teams can better understand global markets, communicate with clients worldwide, and expand their business overseas. This is essential for companies that aim to remain competitive in an increasingly interconnected world.
For these reasons, companies should hire more people from foreign countries, as it improves their human resources and helps them succeed in global markets. (122語)

I agree that people are too reliant on technology today.
First, technology can reduce efficiency in the long term. While digital tools are designed to save time, overreliance can weaken problem-solving and critical thinking skills. People often depend on apps or search engines for simple tasks, which limits their ability to handle challenges independently.
Second, technology has changed the way we communicate, sometimes negatively. Social media and messaging apps allow instant contact, but they can reduce face-to-face interactions and make it harder to develop deep personal relationships. Overreliance on digital communication can lead to misunderstandings and weaker social skills.
For these reasons, people are too reliant on technologies today, as it affects both their efficiency and the quality of their communication. (121語)

I agree that developed countries should provide technological assistance to developing nations.
First, such assistance promotes equality. Many developing nations lack access to modern technology, which limits education, healthcare, and economic opportunities. By sharing knowledge and tools, developed countries can help reduce the gap between wealthy and poorer nations, giving people in developing regions a fairer chance to improve their lives.
Second, technological support contributes to sustainability. Advanced technologies can help address environmental and resource challenges, such as renewable energy, water management, and efficient farming techniques. Developing nations that adopt these solutions can grow economically without causing severe harm to the planet.
For these reasons, developed countries should provide technological assistance to developing nations, as it promotes equality and supports sustainable development. (122語)

I disagree that technological advancements will eliminate inequality.
First, unequal access to information remains a major barrier. While technology provides vast knowledge online, many people in low-income areas or developing countries cannot afford devices or reliable internet. This digital divide prevents them from benefiting fully from technological advancements.
Second, education plays a crucial role in reducing inequality, and technology alone cannot replace it. Without proper teaching and guidance, people may lack the skills to use technology effectively. Digital tools are helpful, but they cannot provide the structured learning and critical thinking development that quality education offers.
For these reasons, technological advancements alone will not eliminate inequality, as unequal access to information and the need for education continue to create opportunity gaps. (121語)

I disagree that the government should spend more money on space exploration.
First, investing heavily in space exploration may not bring immediate technological benefits for society. While space programs can drive innovation, the research often focuses on specialized fields that do not directly improve daily life for most citizens. Basic public services such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure could benefit more from government funding.
Second, government spending on space exploration is a risky investment. The costs are extremely high, and the return on investment is uncertain or may take decades to materialize. Allocating funds to more practical areas, such as renewable energy or disaster prevention, would provide more immediate and reliable benefits for the population.
For these reasons, the government should not spend more money on space exploration, as other areas of public investment are likely to yield greater societal advantages. (141語)

I agree that the government should promote the use of renewable energies.
First, renewable energies help protect the environment. Unlike fossil fuels, sources such as solar, wind, and hydroelectric power produce little or no greenhouse gases. By encouraging their use, governments can reduce pollution and combat climate change, creating a healthier planet for current and future generations.
Second, promoting renewable energy can create jobs. Developing, installing, and maintaining renewable energy systems requires skilled workers, which generates employment opportunities in many sectors. This not only supports economic growth but also provides new career paths for people in regions affected by declines in traditional industries.
For these reasons, the government should promote the use of renewable energies, as it benefits both the environment and the economy by creating sustainable jobs. (128語)

I agree that the government should ban the use of plastic bags.
First, banning plastic bags can significantly reduce waste. Single-use plastic bags often end up in landfills or the ocean, where they take hundreds of years to decompose. Reducing their use would decrease the amount of plastic waste and help maintain cleaner urban and natural environments.
Second, a ban would benefit the environment. Plastic pollution harms wildlife and ecosystems, and microplastics can even enter the food chain, affecting humans. By eliminating plastic bags, the government can protect biodiversity and promote a healthier planet.
For these reasons, the government should ban the use of plastic bags, as doing so reduces waste and protects the environment for current and future generations. (120語)

I agree that people should do more to protect wild animals for the following two reasons.
First, protecting wild animals helps maintain biodiversity. Every species plays a unique role in ecosystems, and the loss of even a single species can disrupt the natural balance. By conserving wildlife, we ensure that ecosystems remain healthy and functional for the benefit of all living creatures on the planet.
Second, protecting wild animals benefits the environment. Animals contribute to processes such as pollination, seed dispersal, and controlling pest populations. Preserving their habitats supports these natural functions and promotes a cleaner and more sustainable environment.
For these reasons, people should do more to protect wild animals, as doing so preserves biodiversity and helps maintain a healthy environment. (122語)

I agree that people should do more to prevent global warming for the following two reasons.
First, taking action against global warming is essential to protect the environment. Rising temperatures cause extreme weather, rising sea levels, and the destruction of natural habitats. By reducing greenhouse gas emissions and using renewable energy, we can slow down climate change and preserve ecosystems for future generations.
Second, global warming threatens animals. Many species are losing their habitats or facing extinction due to climate change. Protecting the environment helps ensure that animals can survive and maintain biodiversity, which is vital for ecological balance.
For these reasons, people should do more to prevent global warming, as it safeguards both the environment and animal life on our planet. (122語)